Trump: China May Be ‘Knowingly Responsible’ for Release of COVID-19 Virus
President Donald Trump this week continued what has been a ratcheting narrative involving China’s culpability in the COVID-19 global pandemic this week, for the first time floating publicly the potential that Beijing not only knew that the virus had been released, but engaged actively not just in concealing that fact, but in the release itself. The President’s words can only be seen as a further walk down the gangway to war.
In January, I told readers and listeners that Russia’s lightning fast response to the Wuhan outbreak could only be the result of superior on the ground organic intelligence, or vastly more troublingly, the result of prior warning by Beijing of an operation that was about to go live.
In February, I related inside reports of information given to both Senate Intelligence members and the Trump administration about the true nature of the Wuhan BSL-4 release of a scientifically altered pathogen, fast on the heels of Trump’s signing of a Phase I trade reset with Beijing and Trump’s acquittal in the pantywaist farce of Ukrainian Collusion that was but the freshest in a long succession of Democrat desperation measures to deal with a power structure slipping from their grasp.
This week, President Donald Trump gave solidifying language to the circumstantial and clinical evidence that Beijing may have inflicted an asymmetrical microbiological wound on the world and American economies with the release of a scientifically enhanced pathogen that has disrupted world supply chains, staggered western economies and sent the world petroleum and equities markets into a tailspin with predictable but nightmarish destination.
President Donald Trump raised the prospect that China deliberately caused the Covid-19 outbreak that’s killed over 39,000 Americans and said there should be consequences if the country is found to be “knowingly responsible.”
Dr. Deborah Birx, a member of the White House coronavirus task force, said Sunday that the first country exposed to a pandemic has a “moral obligation” to be transparent in its response.
“Let’s see what happens with their investigation. But we’re doing investigations also,” Trump said at a White House news conference on Saturday. “If it was a mistake, a mistake is a mistake. But if they were knowingly responsible, yeah, then there should be consequences.”
–President Donald Trump
“Let’s see what happens with their investigation. But we’re doing investigations also,” Trump said at a White House news conference on Saturday. “If it was a mistake, a mistake is a mistake. But if they were knowingly responsible, yeah, then there should be consequences.”
Trump’s evolving language on China’s potential culpability in an intentional release has been undertaken with understandable nuance and restraint given the obvious diplomatic constraints and connotations of an outright indictment of Beijing’s actions in the outset of the COVID-19 outbreak, no matter how founded the means, motive and opportunity for China to benefit by such an attack. If he or Senate Intelligence Committee members like Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton were to opine openly that China launced a weaponized version of a research super pathogen for the equalizing of economic scores, options not including hot-war engagement between the two superpowers would be considerably constrained.
With burgeoning scientific consensus by the likes of HIV discoverer Luc Montagnier and an elite consortium of virologists and microbiologists in the nation of India that the Wuhan virus contains indefatigable evidence of molecular alteration that can only be achieved via laboratory manipulation, there is growing reason to limit potential scenarios of the COVID-19 introduction into human space as one of unforgivable negligence or unspeakably evil intent.
While much of the American populace debates the true severity of the disease and whether it has warranted Trump’s evolving and very serious policy response, this veritable Cuban missile crisis for the 21st Century unfolds under scrutiny of microscopy and a firm knowledge that both China and their complicit American Democrat toadies have much to gain both by obliterating Trump’s astonishing and unlikely reset of American economic primacy and casting his administration as too slow and casual in their response to a world catastrophe.
Trump’s acknowledgment of possible nefarious intent signals a new stage in this warming war that may very well turn hotter than an autoclave or a mobile cremation unit, in what amounts to the most disparately defined and misunderstood military offensive of the past two centuries.
